Últimas Noticias de Aviación Comercial

Airline Delays in U.S. Have Quadrupled in 30 Years, Harvard Researcher Says

Redacción - Aviación al Día

On a hot June afternoon in Boston, a typical summer storm was enough to bring Logan International Airport to a complete standstill. This was not due to a natural disaster or a catastrophic failure but rather a predictable event that left hundreds of passengers stranded for hours. Among them were the parents of Maxwell Tabarrok, a doctoral student in Economics and a future Harvard Business School student.

The incident sparked a question in Tabarrok: How is it possible for such a massive infrastructure to halt over such a common inconvenience? To find answers, he analyzed over 30 years—and 100 gigabytes—of data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. His conclusion was stark: delays of three hours or more are now four times as frequent as they were three decades ago.

Padded Schedules: The Invisible Strategy

The study revealed that airlines have resorted to “padding” their schedules to mask their performance metrics. On average, they have added an extra 20 minutes to scheduled flight durations, allowing flights to appear “on time” in official records even if the actual travel time hasn’t improved.

Between 1987 and 2000, actual and scheduled flight times remained nearly identical. However, starting in 2000, they began to diverge significantly—a deliberate move by airlines, according to Tabarrok, to reduce the perceived rate of delays.

This artificial adjustment comes at a cost: using data on the average U.S. wage, the researcher estimated that the time lost by passengers amounts to roughly $6 billion annually.

→ Global Passenger Demand Grows in June, but at a Slower Pace, IATA says

Structural Causes: Beyond Bad Weather

While adverse weather tops the list of delays not attributable to airlines, the problem runs deeper. The saturation of the U.S. air traffic system has been exacerbated by:

Since 2000, passenger traffic has increased by 50%, packing more travelers into facilities that haven’t expanded proportionally. The use of larger aircraft has partially alleviated demand but has also created bottlenecks: slower boarding, longer disembarkation times, and extended ground operations.

Misaligned Incentives

For Tabarrok, the core issue lies in incentives. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) bears no economic cost for delays nor receives rewards for improving punctuality. “The cost of delays could quadruple in the next decade without negatively affecting anyone’s career at the FAA,” he warns.

Hiring and training more air traffic controllers would be, in his view, the most direct and viable short-term solution. However, a lack of decisive leadership and bureaucratic inertia hinder progress. Larger projects, like new airports or runways, face environmental reviews and legal battles that can drag on for a decade.

A Grim Outlook

Without substantial changes in staffing and procedures, every summer storm or technical glitch will continue to trigger airport gridlock and the loss of millions of productive hours. Tabarrok estimates that by multiplying the value of passengers’ time by the hours wasted, losses will keep adding up to billions annually.

The FAA, for its part, maintains that safety is its top priority—even if it means delays—and attributes most disruptions to weather.

The report not only quantifies the growing problem of delays but also exposes an uncomfortable truth: until infrastructure and human resources adapt to rising demand, passengers will keep paying—in time and money—for a system that no longer runs on time.

Source: Fortune

Exit mobile version