Singapore Airlines Flight 321 Final Report: Weather Radar Failure Suspected Following Severe Turbulence

The final report on Singapore Airlines Flight 321, which encountered severe turbulence in May 2024, reveals that the aircraft’s weather radar system may have malfunctioned. The incident, which resulted in one passenger fatality and dozens of injuries, raises industry-wide alarms regarding the reliability of onboard weather detection equipment.

Key Findings by the Transport Safety Investigation Bureau

Singapore’s Transport Safety Investigation Bureau (TSIB) issued a 59-page final report following an in-depth investigation into the incident, which occurred at flight level 370 (37,000 feet) over Myanmar.

While the investigative body refrained from directly attributing responsibility for the incident to the flight software, the document’s conclusions strongly indicate that a weather radar malfunction “cannot be ruled out” as the triggering factor in the chain of events.

The flight crew of the aircraft—a Boeing 777-300ER operating the route from London to Singapore—stated that the aircraft’s radar system showed no convective weather formations or systems of concern on their displays before entering the area of severe turbulence.

Tragic Cabin Toll

The impact of the turbulence was devastating for occupants who were not secured in their seats:

Given these circumstances, the investigation underscored the critical importance of keeping seatbelts fastened at all times, as the vast majority of serious injuries occurred among passengers who had unfastened their restraint systems.

Flight Data Reinforces Hypothesis of Deliberate Act in China Eastern Boeing 737 Crash

Maintenance History and Manufacturer Discrepancies

Technical analysis of the aircraft’s maintenance logs brought to light revealing data regarding the prior performance of the weather detection equipment:

During technical inspections after that prior flight returned to Singapore, maintenance personnel verified that the right-side display exhibited an incorrect storm development level compared to the data on the left-side display. However, the weather radar manufacturer (whose name was not disclosed) refuted part of these diagnoses, claiming that recommended testing manuals and procedures were not followed.

Industry Recommendations and Airline Actions

The TSIB report urges aircraft manufacturers to design new methodologies to certify the proper functioning of radar displays and to structure clear manuals so that pilots can troubleshoot display technical issues mid-flight.

For its part, the airline expressed its respect for the final report, extending a renewed apology to passengers and crew members for the traumatic experience. The company reported that it has already implemented substantial improvements in its operations:

Exit mobile version